The Experiences of Midwives in Caring for Vulnerable Pregnant Women in The Netherlands: A Qualitative Cross-Sectional Study

6Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Vulnerable pregnant women have an increased risk for preterm birth and perinatal mortality. This study identifies the perspectives, perceived barriers, and perceived facilitators of midwives toward current care for vulnerable pregnant women in the Netherlands. Knowing those perspectives, barriers, and facilitators could help increase quality of care, thereby reducing the risks of preterm birth and perinatal mortality. Midwives working in primary care practices throughout the Netherlands were interviewed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted remotely through a video conference program, audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded based on the theoretical domains framework and concepts derived from the interviews, using NVivo-12. All midwives provided psychosocial care for vulnerable pregnant women, expected positive consequences for those women resulting from that care, considered it their task to identify and refer vulnerable women, and intended to improve the situation for mother and child. The main barriers perceived by midwives were too many organizations being involved, inadequate communication between care providers, lack of time to care for vulnerable women, insufficient financing to provide adequate care, and uncooperative clients. The main facilitators were having care coordinators, treatment guidelines, vulnerability detection tools, their own knowledge about local psychosocial organizations, good communication skills, cooperative clients, consultation with colleagues, and good communication between care providers. The findings suggest that midwives are highly motivated to care for vulnerable women and perceive a multitude of facilitators. However, they also perceive various barriers for providing optimal care. A national guideline on how to care for vulnerable women, local overviews of involved organizations, and proactive midwives who ensure connections between the psychosocial and medical domain could help to overcome these barriers, and therefore, maximize effectiveness of the care for vulnerable pregnant women.

References Powered by Scopus

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

23962Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic

13037Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research

2907Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Barriers and enablers to antenatal care attendance for women referred to social work services in a Victorian regional hospital: A qualitative descriptive study

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Identifying psychosocial vulnerabilities in pregnancy: A mixed-method systematic review of the knowledge base of antenatal conversational psychosocial assessment tools

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Meeting the needs of pregnant women in socially vulnerable situations: A phenomenological qualitative study

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vlassak, E., Bessems, K., & Gubbels, J. (2023). The Experiences of Midwives in Caring for Vulnerable Pregnant Women in The Netherlands: A Qualitative Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare (Switzerland), 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11010130

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 4

57%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

29%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free