Liposomal amphotericin B versus conventional amphotericin B in the empirical treatment of persistently febrile neutropenic patients

74Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Liposomal amphotercin B was compared with conventional amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in febrile neutropenic patients in a randomized, double-blind, multicentre trial. Using a composite end-point, the two drugs were equivalent in overall efficacy. However, the liposomal amphotericin B treatment group had fewer proven fungal infections, fewer infusion-related side effects and less nephrotoxicity. Patient data from that study were analysed to compare the pharmacoeconomics of liposomal versus conventional amphotericin B therapy. Itemized billing data from 414 patients were collected and analysed. Hospital costs from first dose were significantly higher for all patients who received liposomal amphotericin B ($48 962 versus $43 183, P = 0.02). However, hospital costs were very sensitive to the cost of the study medication ($39 648 versus $43 048, when acquisition costs are not included, P = 0.4). Using decision analysis models and sensitivity analyses to vary the cost of study medications and risk of nephrotoxicity, the break-even points for the cost of liposomal therapy were calculated to range from $72 to $87 per 50 mg for all patients, and $83 to $112 per 50 mg in allogeneic bone marrow transplant patients. Therefore, the drug acquisition costs and the risk of nephrotoxicity are important factors in determining the cost-effectiveness of liposomal amphotericin B as empirical therapy in persistently febrile neutropenic patients. In a recent randomized double-blind study comparing liposomal amphotericin B at 3 or 5 mg/kg/day with amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) 5 mg/kg/day as empirical antifungal treatment in patients with febrile neutropenia, liposomal amphotericin B was associated with less toxicity than ABLC, both in terms of infusion-related reactions and nephrotoxicity. The incidence of study drug discontinuation due to toxicity was: liposomal amphotericin B 3 mg/kg/day, 14%; liposomal amphotericin B 5 mg/kg/day, 15%; and ABLC, 42% (P < 0.001).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cagnoni, P. J. (2002). Liposomal amphotericin B versus conventional amphotericin B in the empirical treatment of persistently febrile neutropenic patients. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 49(SUPL. S1), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/49.suppl_1.81

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free