Teaching quality in different subject matters in German-speaking countries—Inbetween genericness and subject-specificity

27Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this synthesis paper, the current state of research regarding teaching quality is discussed comparing science education, physical education, and history education, by referring to research on teaching in general. A framework with seven dimensions (Praetorius and Charalambous 2018) was used as a comparison base. This framework contains the dimensions of selecting and introducing the content and subject matter methods, cognitive activation, support of practicing, formative assessment, support of all students’ learning, socio-emotional support, and classroom management. The comparison across subject matters showed that subject-specificity was dependent on the level under consideration: On the dimension level, no adaptations and supplementations were deemed necessary. On the level of sub-dimensions, and especially on the level of observable indicators for these sub-dimensions, this was, however, the case. Challenges for future research are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Praetorius, A. K., Herrmann, C., Gerlach, E., Zülsdorf-Kersting, M., Heinitz, B., & Nehring, A. (2020). Teaching quality in different subject matters in German-speaking countries—Inbetween genericness and subject-specificity. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 48(3), 409–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-020-00082-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free