In this synthesis paper, the current state of research regarding teaching quality is discussed comparing science education, physical education, and history education, by referring to research on teaching in general. A framework with seven dimensions (Praetorius and Charalambous 2018) was used as a comparison base. This framework contains the dimensions of selecting and introducing the content and subject matter methods, cognitive activation, support of practicing, formative assessment, support of all students’ learning, socio-emotional support, and classroom management. The comparison across subject matters showed that subject-specificity was dependent on the level under consideration: On the dimension level, no adaptations and supplementations were deemed necessary. On the level of sub-dimensions, and especially on the level of observable indicators for these sub-dimensions, this was, however, the case. Challenges for future research are discussed.
CITATION STYLE
Praetorius, A. K., Herrmann, C., Gerlach, E., Zülsdorf-Kersting, M., Heinitz, B., & Nehring, A. (2020). Teaching quality in different subject matters in German-speaking countries—Inbetween genericness and subject-specificity. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 48(3), 409–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-020-00082-8
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.