Avid versus struggling readers: Co-construed pupil identities in school booktalk

26Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the present article, we argue for a combination of reader reception studies and discursive psychology that we would like to call discursive reception studies: that is, discursive-psychological analyses of reader reception data. Such approaches provide possibilities to analyse the role of social interaction in the co-construction of the reading of a given book (or talk on a film or other reader reception data). Drawing on detailed analyses of video-recorded teacher-led booktalk sessions in grades 4-7, pupils self presentations and other types of co-construed categorizations of readers are examined and discussed in relation to the pupils and teachers co-construction of two contrasting categories of reader positions: avid readers (bokslukare ; literally, book-devourers), on the one hand, and struggling readers , on the other. These categorizations in turn involve two different sets of continua in terms of the participants (pupils) spontaneous positionings: one based on motivation (willing versus unwilling readers) and one based on reading speed (fast versus slow readers). Both sets of contrasting categories involve implicit local hierarchies, yet these two continua do not necessarily overlap. An important finding is that the position of a fast reader does not imply the position of a book-lover. Through detailed examinations of the participants co-construed local hierarchies in booktalk, this study documents ways in which discursive reception studies may contribute to a deeper understanding of reading as a situated social practice. Our findings have implications for teacher training, with respect to the promotion of literary reading among children. Copyright © 2009 SAGE Publications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eriksson Barajas, K., & Aronsson, K. (2009). Avid versus struggling readers: Co-construed pupil identities in school booktalk. Language and Literature, 18(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947009105854

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free