Professional Malpractice

  • Zwitter M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Five key issues on medical malpractice will be discussed.1. Many cases of malpractice are settled with good communication and an excuse, when appropriate. In contrast, weak communication is at the roots of most cases that are brought to the attention of a wider community, to media, or to the legal system. 2. Accusations of medical malpractice often originate from misunderstanding of medicine as an accurate scientific discipline. Patients, their relatives, lawyers, and journalists do not understand that medical decisions are often based on incomplete or non-specific diagnostic procedures, and that the most probable diagnosis in a certain situation may not be the correct one. 3. Regardless of whether a suboptimal outcome is due to circumstances beyond physician’s control or to a clearly inappropriate decision, a patient should be entitled to financial compensation. 4. Prosecution of individual physicians is justified only in rare cases of overt misbehavior. 5. Open discussion and careful analysis of every case of malpractice are essential steps for the prevention of it and the improvement of patient safety.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zwitter, M. (2019). Professional Malpractice. In Medical Ethics in Clinical Practice (pp. 57–62). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00719-5_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free