The Emotional Geography of Work and Family Life

  • Hochschild A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This reprinted chapter originally appeared in Gender relation in public and private, 1996. Over the last two decades, American workers have increasingly divided into a majority who work too many hours and a minority with no work at all. This split hurts families at both extremes, but I focus here on the growing scarcity of time among the long-hours majority. For many of them, a speed-up at the office and factory has marginalized life at home, so that the very term "work-family balance" seems to them a bland slogan with little bearing on real life. In this reading, I describe the speed-up and review a range of cultural responses to it, including "family-friendly reforms" such as flextime, job sharing, part-time work and parental leave. Why, I ask, do people not resist the speed-up more than they do? When offered these reforms, why don't more take advantage of them? Drawing upon my ongoing research in an American Fortune 500 company, I argue that a company's "family-friendly" policy goes only as deep as the "emotional geography" of the workplace and home, the drawn and redrawn boundaries between the sacred and the profane. I show how ways of talking about time (for example, separating "quality" from "quantity" time) become code words to describe that emotional geography. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: create)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hochschild, A. R. (1996). The Emotional Geography of Work and Family Life. In Gender Relations in Public and Private (pp. 13–32). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24543-7_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free