Healing of abdominal wall aponeurosis of rats after incision with either cold scalpel or electrocautery

10Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the healing of abdominal wall aponeurosis of rats after incision with either cold scalpel or electrocautery. Methods: Twelve male adults Wistar inbreed rats weightin 258-362g entered the experiment. They were randomly divided in two groups, control group (N= 6) and experimental group (N= 6). All animals underwent anesthesia followed abdominal wall incision with either cold scalpel (controls) or electrocautery (experimental group). The animals were killed on the 10th day and necropsied. Tissue samples containig the abdominal wall aponeurosis were sent for both histological study and hydroxyproline content assay. Results: The histological study showed no significant difference between the two groups. Hydroxiproline content in experimenral group (128,56 [78,98-198,92] μg/100m) was not significantly different from control group (140,27 [116,20-166,59] μg/100ml; p = 0.53). Conclusion: Healing of abdominal wall after dieresis with either cold scalpel or electrocautery are equivalent and do not differ.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garcia, A., Nascimento, J. E. A., Darold, E. M., Pimentel, R. E. D. F., Curvo, E. A., & Daud, F. O. (2007). Healing of abdominal wall aponeurosis of rats after incision with either cold scalpel or electrocautery. In Acta Cirurgica Brasileira (Vol. 22, pp. 12–15). Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento de Pesquisa em Cirurgia. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502007000700004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free