Inappropriate prescribing in an elderly population: findings from a South African public sector survey

  • Chetty R
  • Gray A
6Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To quantify the extent of potentially inappropriate prescribing among elderly patients seen at public sector primary health care facilities and old age homes in a South African urban setting. Method: Cross-sectional survey of the prescription charts of patients aged 65 years or older, using a list of potentially inappropriate medicines in elderly patients, modified from that established by Beers and further developed by consensus. Setting: A provincial government chronic prescription pharmacy servicing public sector primary health care clinics and old age homes in the Durban metropole. Key findings: Of the 6,410 prescriptions that were reviewed, 1,926 (30.0%) included at least one medication listed as potentially inappropriate in the elderly. The median number of chronic medications prescribed per patient was 4 (range 1 to 11). Although the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in patients receiving medication at primary health care clinics (29.7%) was similar to the prevalence in those resident in old age homes (31.8%), this difference was shown to be significant upon multivariate analysis. Age was not found to be a predictor of inappropriate prescribing. An association was found between sex and inappropriate prescribing, with female sex being associated with a greater degree of potentially inappropriate prescribing. Conclusion: This study has shown that 30% of elderly patients were prescribed at least one potentially inappropriate medicine. Women were more likely than men to be prescribed potentially inappropriate medicines.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chetty, R., & Gray, A. (2010). Inappropriate prescribing in an elderly population: findings from a South African public sector survey. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 12(3), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1211/0022357044256

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free