Comparing alternative biomass supply options for Canada: What story do cost curves tell?

6Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Policy makers and investors often need to consider trade-offs between alternative biomass-based energy supply options. Supply cost potentials for three bioenergy feedstocks prevalent in Canada including agricultural residues, dedicated woody crops, and forest harvest residues are summarized. Each feedstock has its own particular cost characteristics depending on the quantities involved. Importantly, this synthesis revealed significant differences in the uncertainty associated with the cost estimates, with agricultural residues having the greatest variation, followed by woody crops and postharvest forest residues, respectively. One implication of this uncertainty is that the attractiveness of each feedstock option likely depends on local market demand conditions and producer circumstances, making definitive aggregate supply estimates challenging.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yemshanov, D., McKenney, D. W., & Hope, E. S. (2018). Comparing alternative biomass supply options for Canada: What story do cost curves tell? BioResources, 13(2), 3157–3164. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.13.2.3157-3164

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘2202468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

55%

Researcher 4

36%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

38%

Engineering 2

25%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

25%

Social Sciences 1

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2360

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0