Epidemiology of faecal incontinence: A review of population-based studies

5Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Two recent reviews provide perspective on the prevalence of faecal incontinence. Matibag et al. (2003) suggest a range of 1%-11% in population-based studies and 4%-50% in other, mainly clinic-based studies. Harrari (2002) suggests a range of 2%-18% in the community as distinct from 13%-54% in long-term care. The issues raised by these and other reviews (Tariq et al. 2003) include a lack of definition of concepts and indicators, inconsistent age and gender relationships, lack of information on social groups and differences in health-related risk factors identified. The aim of this paper is to review all the evidence from population-based studies and thereby clarify the epidemiology of faecal incontinence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McGrother, C. W. (2005). Epidemiology of faecal incontinence: A review of population-based studies. In Urinary and Fecal Incontinence: An Interdisciplinary Approach (pp. 13–23). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27494-4_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free