A fundamental problem in neuroscience is understanding how working memory - the ability to store information at intermediate timescales, like tens of seconds - is implemented in realistic neuronal networks. The most likely candidate mechanism is the attractor network, and a great deal of effort has gone toward investigating it theoretically. Yet, despite almost a quarter century of intense work, attractor networks are not fully understood. In particular, there are still two unanswered questions. First, how is it that attractor networks exhibit irregular firing, as is observed experimentally during working memory tasks? And second, how many memories can be stored under biologically realistic conditions? Here we answer both questions by studying an attractor neural network in which inhibition and excitation balance each other. Using mean-field analysis, we derive a three-variable description of attractor networks. From this description it follows that irregular firing can exist only if the number of neurons involved in a memory is large. The same mean-field analysis also shows that the number of memories that can be stored in a network scales with the number of excitatory connections, a result that has been suggested for simple models but never shown for realistic ones. Both of these predictions are verified using simulations with large networks of spiking neurons. © 2007 Roudi and Latham.
CITATION STYLE
Roudi, Y., & Latham, P. E. (2007). A balanced memory network. PLoS Computational Biology, 3(9), 1679–1700. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030141
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.