Background: We report on a comparative ethno-ornithological study of Zapotec and Cuicatec communities in Northern Oaxaca, Mexico that provided a challenge to some existing descriptions of folk classification. Our default model was the taxonomic system of ranks developed by Brent Berlin.Methods: Fieldwork was conducted in the Zapotec village of San Miguel Tiltepec and in the Cuicatec village of San Juan Teponaxtla, using a combination of ethnographic interviews and pile-sorting tests. Post-fieldwork, Principal Component Analysis using NTSYSpc V. 2.11f was applied to obtain pattern variation for the answers from different participants.Results and conclusion: Using language and pile-sorting data analysed through Principal Component Analysis, we show how both Zapotec and Cuicatec subjects place a particular emphasis on an intermediate level of classification. These categories group birds with non-birds using ecological and behavioral criteria, and violate a strict distinction between symbolic and mundane (or 'natural'), and between 'general-purpose' and 'single-purpose' schemes. We suggest that shared classificatory knowledge embodying everyday schemes for apprehending the world of birds might be better reflected in a multidimensional model that would also provide a more realistic basis for developing culturally-informed conservation strategies. © 2013 Alcántara-Salinas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
CITATION STYLE
Alcántara-Salinas, G., Ellen, R. F., Valiñas-Coalla, L., Caballero, J., & Argueta-Villamar, A. (2013). Alternative ways of representing Zapotec and Cuicatec folk classification of birds: A multidimensional model and its implications for culturally-informed conservation in Oaxaca, México. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-9-81
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.