Subjective donor deferral as a tool for increased blood transfusion safety: A cross-sectional observational study

0Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims at evaluating whether subjective donor deferral (SDD) has the potential for increasing blood transfusion safety. Background: Appropriate donor selection via clinical and serologic screening is necessary to prevent transfusion-transmissible infections (TTIs). One additional strategy adopted by some Brazilian blood transfusion centers (BTCs) is the rejection of a donation by the pre-donation interviewer based on subjective factors. Methods/Materials: We conducted a STROBE-guided cross-sectional study including 105 005 prospective donors who presented to our BTC between 1 January 2013, and 31 December 2015. Donors were evaluated for age, gender, education level, donation type and history, confidential unit exclusion, SDD, and results of serologic screening for TTIs. Results: Even after controlling for potential confounding variables, subjectively deferred donors were more likely to have at least one reactive serology in the standard screening (OR: 2.80; 95% CI: 2.13-3.69; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Moura, J. G., Costa, B. A., Silva, F. A. C., Fechine, F. V., Macedo, Ê. S., Barbosa, J. L. J., … Brunetta, D. M. (2021). Subjective donor deferral as a tool for increased blood transfusion safety: A cross-sectional observational study. Health Science Reports, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.424

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free