To Tell or Not to Tell: Shared decision making, CAM use and disclosure among underserved patients with rheumatic diseases

18Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this analysis was to assess the impact of perceived shared decision-making (SDM) on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use and disclosure in a sample of urban, underserved minority patients (n = 109) with rheumatic diseases. Nearly three quarters of the patients (71.6%) reported CAM use. Of these, 59% disclosed CAM use to their provider. Logistic regression models were created. In model 1 SDM significantly predicted CAM use; however, the overall model fit was not significant. In model 2, gender, ethnicity, and SDM predicted CAM disclosure with 73.2% correctly classified. Females were more likely and Hispanics were less likely to disclose CAM use. Those with higher SDM scores were more likely to disclose CAM use. SDM played a role in whether patients used CAM and disclosed CAM use to their providers. Improving SDM strategies may be especially important among patients who are least likely to disclose CAM use. © the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wallen, G. R., & Brooks, A. T. (2012). To Tell or Not to Tell: Shared decision making, CAM use and disclosure among underserved patients with rheumatic diseases. Integrative Medicine Insights, 2012(7), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.4137/IMI.S10333

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free