Disjunction of natural concepts

90Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the way in which the rated membership of items in disjunctively defined categories, such as FRUITS OR VEGETABLES and PETS OR FARMYARD ANIMALS, varies as a function of membership in individual constituent categories. Items were rated for category membership and typicality in each category separately, and in their disjunction. The results showed non-Boolean effects of both overextension and underextension of the disjunctions. Typicality in the disjunction was highly predictable from constituent typicality values, using regression equations with negative interaction terms. The results are compared with similar effects for concept conjunctions and are discussed in terms of an intensional model of conceptual combination (Hampton, 1987b, 1988). © 1988 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

Fuzzy sets

71868Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories

3667Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Principles of Categorization

2939Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Prototype theory and compositionality

357Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantum structure in cognition

263Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Concepts and their dynamics: A quantum-theoretic modeling of human thought

169Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hampton, J. A. (1988). Disjunction of natural concepts. Memory & Cognition, 16(6), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197059

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

53%

Researcher 5

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

21%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 6

46%

Computer Science 3

23%

Physics and Astronomy 2

15%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

15%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free