The informal sector in the structure of the national economy: Simulation and evaluation

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Research into the shadow economy of a country has scientific and practical value. Any state is interested in evaluating the size of its shadow economy, as it affects the goals and priorities of the country’s development. This study presents a model for evaluating the shadow economy in the Russian Federation. The authors developed and analyzed an approach to measuring the shadow economy based on factor analysis and a MIMIC model. The study features factor analysis of official statistics for Russia over the period 1992 to 2019, with more than 150 indicators characterizing different spheres of the life of the country. The authors determined the factors affected by Russia’s shadow economy, built a MIMIC model on this basis, and estimated its size. Assessing the size of shadow activity is important for analyzing economic development and the impact of government regulations on it.

References Powered by Scopus

Shining a light on the shadows: Identifying robust determinants of the shadow economy

115Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Taxing the unobservable: The impact of the shadow economy on inflation and taxation

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Do lower taxes reduce informality? Evidence from Brazil

60Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Policy roadmap for a sustainable informal business sector

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Determinants of the Shadow Economy in Russian society

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lizina, O. M., Bistyaykina, D. A., Ermakova, E. R., Badokina, T. E., & Solovyeva, T. V. (2020). The informal sector in the structure of the national economy: Simulation and evaluation. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 7(3), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v7i3.599

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 2

67%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

50%

Computer Science 1

25%

Psychology 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0