One sided crossing minimization is NP-hard for sparse graphs

42Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The one sided crossing minimization problem consists of placing the vertices of one part of a bipartite graph on prescribed positions on a straight line and finding the positions of the vertices of the second part on a parallel line and drawing the edges as straight lines such that the number of pairwise edge crossings is minimized. This problem represents the basic building block used for drawing hierarchical graphs aesthetically or producing row-based VLSI layouts. Eades and Wormald [3] showed that the problem is NP-hard for dense graphs. Typical graphs of practical interest are usually very sparse. We prove that the problem remains NP-hard even for forests of 4-stars. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002.

References Powered by Scopus

Methods for Visual Understanding of Hierarchical System Structures

995Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Which aesthetic has the greatest effect on human understanding?

399Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Edge crossings in drawings of bipartite graphs

229Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Visualizing the evolution of communities in dynamic graphs

68Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the complexity of crossings in permutations

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An efficient fixed parameter tractable algorithm for 1-sided crossing minimization

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Muñoz, X., Unger, W., & Vrt’o, I. (2002). One sided crossing minimization is NP-hard for sparse graphs. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 2265 LNCS, pp. 115–123). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45848-4_10

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘12‘15‘16‘17‘18‘2001234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

62%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

15%

Researcher 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 8

62%

Mathematics 3

23%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0