Built environment correlates of walking for transportation: Differences between commuting and non-commuting trips

21Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

As a sustainable mode of travel, walking for transportation has multiple environmental, social, and health-related benefits. In existing studies, however, such walking has rarely been differentiated between commuting and non-commuting trips. Using multilevel zero-inflated negative binomial regression and multilevel Tobit regression models, this study empirically examines the frequency and duration of commuting and non-commuting walking and their correlates in Xiamen, China. It finds that (1) non-commuting walking, on average, has a higher frequency and longer duration than commuting walking; (2) most socio-demographic variables are significant predictors, and age, occupation, and family size have opposite-direction effects on commuting and non-commuting walking; and (3) different sets of built environment variables are correlated with commuting and non-commuting walking, and the built environment collectively influences the latter more significantly than the former. The findings provide useful references for customized interventions concerning promoting commuting and non-commuting walking.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, J., Zhou, J., & Xiao, L. (2021). Built environment correlates of walking for transportation: Differences between commuting and non-commuting trips. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 14(1), 1129–1148. https://doi.org/10.5198/JTLU.2021.1933

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free