Enamel micro-cracks produced around restorations with flowable composites

23Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this study, enamel micro-cracks produced around flowable composite restorations were observed using a stereomicroscope and a scanning confocal laser microscope (SCLM). The effects of polymerization shrinkage, mobility of composite and polishing period after filling on the incidence of marginal enamel micro-cracks were examined. Enamel micro-cracks were observed on all of the composite restorations when the restoration was polished immediately after filling. Enamel micro-cracks distributed approximately parallel to the cavity margin and located 0.01-0.3 mm from the restored cavity margin. The occurrence of enamel micro-cracks was higher in conventional hybrid composite restorations than in flowable composites, and when polished 15 minutes after filling (as compared to 24 hours after filling).

References Powered by Scopus

A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces

1856Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Setting Stress in Composite Resin in Relation to Configuration of the Restoration

1022Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relaxation of Polymerization Contraction Stresses by Flow in Dental Composites

419Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Fatigue resistance and crack propensity of large MOD composite resin restorations: Direct versus CAD/CAM inlays

72Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of the surface hardness of composite resins before and after polishing at different times

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Edge-strength of flowable resin-composites

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Han, L., Okamoto, A., Fukushima, M., & Okiji, T. (2005). Enamel micro-cracks produced around restorations with flowable composites. Dental Materials Journal, 24(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.24.83

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘18‘19‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

81%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Researcher 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 14

82%

Social Sciences 1

6%

Engineering 1

6%

Materials Science 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0