Sistemas forrageiros no semiárido do Estado do Ceará: Tipologia estrutural

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to establish a structural typology of forage systems for 57 rural households in the semiarid region of Ceará state, Brazil. Eighteen variables regarding surface distribution, animal units and stocking rates, buildings and labor availability were submitted to PCA and Cluster analysis. Ten structural forage groups were differentiated based on Caatinga autochthonous forage resources and by goat and sheep pasturing. Only the structural types of Groups 2, 5 and 10 (52.30% of the rural households) could stabilize a lesser pasturing intensity of their areas - as they enjoy specific hydric and dry land forage cultivations, in addition to Caatinga and stubbles-and would therefore cause minor potential impact in the structure of their forage systems. The improving conditions for low Caatinga Importance and no-Caatinga systems (G4 and G3) must be based on optimum exploitation of their stubble surfaces and on specific hydric forage cultivation.

References Powered by Scopus

Changing the course of biodiversity conservation in the caatinga of northeastern Brazil

339Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On non-equilibrium in arid and semi-arid grazing systems

208Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Challenging targets for future agriculture

160Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Lima Vidal, D. (2010). Sistemas forrageiros no semiárido do Estado do Ceará: Tipologia estrutural. Acta Scientiarum - Animal Sciences, 32(4), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v32i4.9549

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘16‘21‘22‘2300.250.50.751

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

50%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

17%

Environmental Science 1

17%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0