Comparison and contrast between XRF and NAA: Used for characterization of obsidian sources in central Mexico

50Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Chemical analysis of the trace elements in the natural volcanic glass obsidian is a proven analytical tool used around the world to conduct provenance investigations on obsidian artifacts. Studies of obsidian artifacts are used to investigate long-distance exchange, study prehistoric migration patterns, identify the preferred sources of raw materials, detect political boundaries, show differential access to raw material sources for elites vs. non-elites, etc. Two of the most successful methods used to analyze obsidian raw materials and artifacts are neutron activation analysis (NAA) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis. In this chapter, both methods are described and compared. An application of both NAA and XRF to conduct a comprehensive characterization of the obsidian sources in central Mexico is presented. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Glascock, M. D. (2011). Comparison and contrast between XRF and NAA: Used for characterization of obsidian sources in central Mexico. In X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (XRF) in Geoarchaeology (pp. 161–192). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6886-9_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free