Patients' preference for triptans and other medications as a tool for assessing the efficacy of acute treatments for migraine

15Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Oral triptans are effective and well tolerated acute treatments for migraine, but clinical differences between them are small and difficult to measure in conventional clinical trials. Patient preference assesses a global measure of efficacy and tolerability,and may be a more sensitive means of distinguishing between these drugs. In a series of studies, patients consistently expressed a clear preference for triptans over their usual non-triptan acute medications, e.g., analgesics and ergotamine. Direct comparator studies of patient preference with oral triptans showed that patients could distinguish between different triptans, and between different formulations of the same triptan. Patients could even distinguish between the three oral doses of sumatriptan. The most frequently provided reasons for preference were speed of response and overall effectiveness. Patient preference is a sensitive clinical trial endpoint and physicians should consider using it when reviewing the efficacy of acute migraine medications. © Springer-Verlag Italia 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dowson, A. J., Tepper, S. J., & Dahlöf, C. (2005, June). Patients’ preference for triptans and other medications as a tool for assessing the efficacy of acute treatments for migraine. Journal of Headache and Pain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10194-005-0164-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free