Wedding of Molecular Alterations and Immune Checkpoint Blockade: Genomics as a Matchmaker

28Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The development of checkpoint blockade immunotherapy has transformed the medical oncology armamentarium. But despite its favorable impact on clinical outcomes, immunotherapy benefits only a subset of patients, and a substantial proportion of these individuals eventually manifest resistance. Serious immune-related adverse events and hyperprogression have also been reported. It is therefore essential to understand the molecular mechanisms and identify the drivers of therapeutic response and resistance. In this review, we provide an overview of the current and emerging clinically relevant genomic biomarkers implicated in checkpoint blockade outcome. US Food and Drug Administration-approved molecular biomarkers of immunotherapy response include mismatch repair deficiency and/or microsatelliteinstability and tumor mutational burden of at least 10 mutations/megabase. Investigational genomic-associated biomarkers for immunotherapy response include alterations of the following genes/associated pathways: chromatin remodeling (ARID1A, PBRM1, SMARCA4, SMARCB1, BAP1), major histocompatibility complex, specific (eg, ultraviolet, APOBEC) mutational signatures, T-cell receptor repertoire, PDL1, POLE/POLD1, and neo-antigens produced by the mutanome, those potentially associated with resistance include β2-microglobulin, EGFR, Keap1, JAK1/JAK2/interferon-gamma signaling, MDM2, PTEN, STK11, and Wnt/Beta-catenin pathway alterations. Prospective clinical trials are needed to assess the role of a composite of these biomarkers to optimize the implementation of precision immunotherapy in patient care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fountzilas, E., Kurzrock, R., Vo, H. H., & Tsimberidou, A. M. (2021, December 1). Wedding of Molecular Alterations and Immune Checkpoint Blockade: Genomics as a Matchmaker. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djab067

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free