Securitization and Mortgage Default

34Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We find that private-securitized loans perform worse than observably similar, nonsecuritized loans, which provides evidence for adverse selection. The effect of securitization is strongest for prime mortgages, which have not been studied widely in the previous literature and, in particular, prime adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs): These become delinquent at a 30 % higher rate when privately securitized. By contrast, our baseline estimates for subprime mortgages show that private-securitized loans default at lower rates. We demonstrate, however, that “early defaulting loans” account for this: those that were so risky that they defaulted before they could be securitized.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elul, R. (2016). Securitization and Mortgage Default. Journal of Financial Services Research, 49(2–3), 281–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-015-0220-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free