Comparison between the EX-PRESS P-50 implant and trabeculectomy in patients with open-angle glaucoma

14Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the EX-PRESS P-50 implant compared to standard trabeculectomy (TBC). Methods: Single-center prospective randomized study; 20 eyes of 20 patients were treated with the EX-PRESS P-50 implant, and 20 eyes of 20 patients with TBC, over a 19-month period. Records of all patients were reviewed and compared. Success was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP)<21 and>5 mmHg or a decrease of 30% of IOP. Failure was defined as>21 mmHg or decline in visual acuity. Statistical analysis was made with Student’s t-test and χ2 test analyzed with SPSS version 13.0. Results: The average follow-up was 8.6 months (±4.9 months) for the EX-PRESS P-50 group and 9.6 months (±5.3 months) for the TBC group. The postoperative visual acuity and IOP were not significantly different. We report more complications in the EX-PRESS P-50 group. At 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up, the control group was found to be free of complications, whereas multiple complications were observed in the EX-PRESS P-50 group at 3 and 6 months follow-up. We found no differences in either group with respect to success. Conclusion: Both procedures are equally effective for the treatment of glaucoma, with 80% success in the EX-PRESS P-50 group and 72.7% in the control group.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mendoza-Mendieta, M. E., López-Venegas, A. P., & Valdés-Casas, G. (2016). Comparison between the EX-PRESS P-50 implant and trabeculectomy in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Clinical Ophthalmology, 10, 269–276. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S94850

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free