Responsibility Under Uncertainty: Which Climate Decisions Matter Most?

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We propose a new method for estimating how much decisions under monadic uncertainty matter. The method is generic and suitable for measuring responsibility in finite horizon sequential decision processes. It fulfills “fairness” requirements and three natural conditions for responsibility measures: agency, avoidance and causal relevance. We apply the method to study how much decisions matter in a stylized greenhouse gas emissions process in which a decision maker repeatedly faces two options: start a “green” transition to a decarbonized society or further delay such a transition. We account for the fact that climate decisions are rarely implemented with certainty and that their consequences on the climate and on the global economy are uncertain. We discover that a “moral” approach towards decision making — doing the right thing even though the probability of success becomes increasingly small — is rational over a wide range of uncertainties.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Botta, N., Brede, N., Crucifix, M., Ionescu, C., Jansson, P., Li, Z., … Richter, T. (2023). Responsibility Under Uncertainty: Which Climate Decisions Matter Most? Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 28(3), 337–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-022-09867-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free