Role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults

28Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has been performed with increasing fre-quency worldwide to improve the low survival rate of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR). Several studies have shown that among patients who experience in-hospital cardiac arrest, better survival outcomes and neurological outcomes can be expected after ECPR than after CCPR. However, studies have not clearly shown a short-term survival benefit of ECPR for patients who experience out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Favorable outcomes are associated with a shorter low-flow time, an initial shockable rhythm, lower serum lactate levels, higher blood pH, and a lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Indications for ECPR include young age, witnessed arrest with bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, an initial shockable rhythm, correctable causes such as a cardiac etiology, and no return of spontaneous circulation within 10-20 minutes of CCPR. ECPR is a complex intervention that requires a highly trained team, specialized equipment, and multidisciplinary support within a healthcare system, and it has the risk of several life-threatening complications. Therefore, physicians should carefully select patients for ECPR who can gain the most benefit, instead of applying ECPR indiscriminately.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, H., & Cho, Y. H. (2020). Role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults. Acute and Critical Care, 35(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4266/ACC.2020.00080

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free