Biceps vs extensor carpi radialis recovery in Frankel grades A and B in spinal cord injury patients

7Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Clinical literature suggests that the wrist extensors show a trend of achieving functional strength earlier than the biceps after spinal cord injury (SCI). Basic research, however, demonstrated that proximal muscles recover earlier than distal muscles after partial denervation. The purpose of this study was to compare biceps to extensor carpi radialis (ECR) recovery of muscle strength in 39 motor complete cervical SCI patients. Biceps (n = 19) and ECR (n = 20) with a 72 hour or 1 week motor grade of 1/5 were compared. Testing was performed weekly for 1 month, and again at 2, 3, 6 and 12 months post injury. The median recovery times to increase one motor grade were: Biceps = 2 months and ECR = 2.5 months (p < 0.3). The median recovery times to increase two motor grades were: Biceps = 2 months and ECR = 3 months (p < 0.4). In conclusion, there was no significant difference between the rates of recovery of the biceps and the ECR up to 12 months post SCI. © 1994 International Medical Society of Paraplegia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kornsgold, L. M., Herbison, G. J., Decena, B. F., & Ditunno, J. F. (1994). Biceps vs extensor carpi radialis recovery in Frankel grades A and B in spinal cord injury patients. Paraplegia, 32(5), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1994.58

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free