Physical attractiveness biases in ratings of employment suitability: Tracking down the "beauty is Beastly" effect

133Citations
Citations of this article
244Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The "what is beautiful is good" heuristic suggests that physically attractive persons benefit from their attractiveness in a large range of situations, including perceptions of employment suitability. Conversely, the "beauty is beastly" effect suggests that attractiveness can be detrimental to women in certain employment contexts, although these findings have been less consistent than those for the "what is beautiful is good" effect. The current research seeks to uncover situations in which beauty might be detrimental for female applicants. In two studies, we found that attractiveness can be detrimental for women applying for masculine sex-typed jobs for which physical appearance is perceived as unimportant. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johnson, S., Podratz, K., Dipboye, R., & Gibbons, E. (2010). Physical attractiveness biases in ratings of employment suitability: Tracking down the “beauty is Beastly” effect. Journal of Social Psychology, 150(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903365414

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free