Prospective cohort study to elucidate the correlation between occupational stress and hypertension risk in oil workers from kelamayi city in the xinjiang uygur autonomous region of China

21Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the major risk factors for hypertension in oil workers, and investigate the effect of occupational stress on the incidence of hypertension after controlling for other risk factors. A prospective cohort approach was used following enrollment of 1354 oil workers. The occupational stress experienced by oil workers was higher than for the general population in China. By the end of the cohort study, 231 new cases of hypertension among the oil workers had been diagnosed. The cumulative incidence of hypertension was 17.06%. There were 44, 112, and 75 workers who developed hypertension in the low, intermediate, and high occupational stress groups, which represented a 12.0%, 15.6%, and 20.3% cumulative incidence, respectively (chi-square value = 9.812, p < 0.01). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model analysis showed that type of work, cigarette smoking, excess body weight, and obesity were risk factors for hypertension (p < 0.05). After risk factors such as type of work, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and body mass index (BMI) were controlled, the hypertension risk (hazard ratio, HR) in the high occupational stress group was 1.549 (1.072-2.236) compared to the low exposure group, and 2.337 (1.191-4.585) in female subjects. Our study indicated that an increase in occupational stress was associated with an increased risk of hypertension after other factors were adjusted.

Figures

  • Table 1. General demographic characteristics of the subjects.
  • Table 2. Comparison of the score of occupational stress between oil workers and Chinese norm.
  • Table 3. Comparison of the score of occupational stress in different types of work groups.
  • Table 4. Comparison of the characteristics of subjects with and without hypertension. BMI: body mass index.
  • Table 5. Comparison of the characteristics of subjects with and without hypertension.
  • Table 5. Cont.
  • Table 6. Comparison of the occupational stress scores of subjects with and without hypertension.
  • Figure 1. Two-year cumulative incidence (%) in different occupational stress groups.

References Powered by Scopus

The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: The JNC 7 report

17419Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

11275Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global burden of hypertension: Analysis of worldwide data

6458Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Body mass index, abdominal adiposity, weight gain and risk of developing hypertension: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of more than 2.3 million participants

135Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Detection and imaging of gadolinium accumulation in human bone tissue by micro- and submicro-XRF

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relationships between smoking habits and the hypertension occurrence among the adults of communities in paniai regency, Papua Indonesia

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, R., Gao, X., Liu, B., Ge, H., Ning, L., Zhao, J., & Liu, J. (2017). Prospective cohort study to elucidate the correlation between occupational stress and hypertension risk in oil workers from kelamayi city in the xinjiang uygur autonomous region of China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14010001

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

74%

Researcher 5

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 13

39%

Medicine and Dentistry 12

36%

Social Sciences 5

15%

Psychology 3

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0