Risk factors, clinical characteristics, and treatment differences between residents with and without nursing home-and non-nursing home-acquired Clostridium difficile infection

12Citations
Citations of this article
120Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in nursing home residents is believed to be high because of the prevalence of predisposing factors such as decreased immune response, multiple comorbidities, medications, increased risk of infection, close proximity of residents, and recent hospitalization. Yet, specific information on CDI in this population is scarce. OBJECTIVES: To investigate differences in clinical and demographic characteristics, treatment, and underlying comorbidities in residents who acquired CDI preadmission (non-nursing home-acquired [NNH-Acquired]) compared with those who acquired CDI after admission to a nursing home (nursing home-acquired [NH-Acquired]) and matched controls. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study of CDI in nursing home residents with a cross-sectional and longitudinal aspect of linked and de-identified pharmacy claims and Minimum Data Set data (MDS) 2.0 records from October 1, 2009, to September 30, 2010. The control group was frequency matched 1:1 for gender, race, and age range to residents with CDI. RESULTS: Of 195,498 residents, 5,044 (2.6%) had a diagnosis of CDI. Compared with controls, CDI patients had less severe cognitive impairment (P < 0.01) and more severe functional impairment (P < 0.01), incontinence (P < 0.01), and diarrhea (P < 0.01). They were more likely to (a) have diabetes, stroke, heart failure, cancer, renal failure, and infections; (b) be treated with antibiotics, corticosteroids, megestrol, and proton pump inhibitors; and (c) be discharged to the hospital (29.3% vs. 14.7%, P = 0.001) than controls. NNH-Acquired CDI was 3 times more prevalent than NH-Acquired CDI. Most residents with NNH-Acquired CDI (85.0%) came from acute care hospitals and were more likely to have heart disease, cancer, and infections, while those with NH-Acquired CDI tended to have more cognitive impairment, reliance on staff for activities of daily living, incontinence, and stroke. Thirty-day retreatment rates for NH-Acquired CDI and NNHAcquired CDI with metronidazole were 72.7% and 68.4%, and with vancomycin were 83.9% and 69.3%, respectively. The facility (Medicare Part A) was the payer for 93.6% of NNH-Acquired CDI and 75% of NH-Acquired CDI treatment; Medicare Part D was the prevalent secondary payer for NNHAquired CDI (19.4%) and NH-Acquired CDI (37.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Residents with CDI had more comorbidities, and the NNHAcquired group bore a higher burden of illness, resulting in differing treatment patterns and outcomes than the NH-Acquired CDI group.

References Powered by Scopus

Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)

2624Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of clostridium difficile infections

1436Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clostridium difficile - More difficult than ever

1177Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Global burden of Clostridium difficile infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis

219Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Microbiome: Effects of ageing and diet

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Infection Trends in US Nursing Homes, 2006-2013

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zarowitz, B. J., Allen, C., O’Shea, T., & Strauss, M. E. (2015). Risk factors, clinical characteristics, and treatment differences between residents with and without nursing home-and non-nursing home-acquired Clostridium difficile infection. Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy, 21(7), 585–595. https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.7.585

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 40

57%

Researcher 21

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 29

41%

Nursing and Health Professions 27

39%

Psychology 10

14%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 4

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free