Provision of ECPR during COVID-19: Evidence, equity, and ethical dilemmas

14Citations
Citations of this article
115Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) to restore circulation during cardiac arrest is a time-critical, resource-intensive intervention of unproven efficacy. The current COVID-19 pandemic has brought additional complexity and significant barriers to the ongoing provision and implementation of ECPR services. The logistics of patient selection, expedient cannulation, healthcare worker safety, and post-resuscitation care must be weighed against the ethical considerations of providing an intervention of contentious benefit at a time when critical care resources are being overwhelmed by pandemic demand.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Worku, E., Gill, D., Brodie, D., Lorusso, R., Combes, A., & Shekar, K. (2020, July 27). Provision of ECPR during COVID-19: Evidence, equity, and ethical dilemmas. Critical Care. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03172-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free