What's new in the diagnosis of head injury?

32Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The diagnosis of DAI is not always easy, and should be based on adequate sampling of appropriate anatomical areas from a sliced, fixed brain. It is now recognised that there is a continuum of traumatic white matter damage, and that DAI represents only the severe end of the scale. Such damage may be detected from very shortly after a head injury - a fact that may give rise to some challenging diagnostic problems. Early axonal injury detected by means of βAPP immunostaining should be interpreted with caution. The most useful tools currently available for detecting axonal damage are antisera to βAPP, PG-M1, and GFAP, used in conjunction with a routine haematoxylin and eosin stain, but even with immunocytochemistry precise dating of histological changes may not be possible.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

White matter integrity and cognition in chronic traumatic brain injury: A diffusion tensor imaging study

825Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Luteolin reduces Alzheimer's disease pathologies induced by traumatic brain injury

136Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Postmortem Orbital Findings in Shaken Baby Syndrome

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Geddes, J. F. (1997). What’s new in the diagnosis of head injury? Journal of Clinical Pathology. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.50.4.271

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

54%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

31%

Researcher 2

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 9

53%

Engineering 4

24%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

12%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free