Amphibians and Reptiles of Lokutu

  • Penner J
  • Rödel M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Education in ethics and professionalism should reflect the realities medical students encounter in the hospital and clinic. METHOD: We performed content analyses on Case Observation and Assessments (COAs) written by third-year medical students about ethical and professional issues encountered during their internal medicine and paediatrics clinical clerkships. RESULTS: A cohort of 141 third-year medical students wrote 272 COAs. Content analyses identified 35 subcategories of ethical and professional issues within 7 major domains: decisions regarding treatment (31.4%), communication (21.4%), professional duties (18.4%), justice (9.8%), student-specific issues (5.4%), quality of care (3.8%), and miscellaneous (9.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Students encountered a wide variety of ethical and professional issues that can be used to guide pre-clinical and clinical education. Comparison of our findings with results from similar studies suggests that the wording of an assignment (specifying "ethical" issues, "professional" issues, or both) may influence the kinds of issues students identify in their experience-based clinical narratives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Penner, J., & Rödel, M.-O. (2022). Amphibians and Reptiles of Lokutu. In A Rapid Biological Assessment of Lokutu, Democratic Republic of Congo. SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1896/978-1-934151-04-4.37

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free