Perceived Peer Exclusion as Predictor of Students' Help-Seeking Strategies in Higher Education: Differences by Gender and University Major

9Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Feeling excluded by fellow students may be associated with lower levels of adaptive help-seeking. In a cross-sectional study, we compared self-reported help-seeking strategies (autonomy-oriented, dependency-oriented, help-seeking avoidance) among N = 418 students in 25 seminar and tutorial groups in the undergraduate introductory courses of two subject domains: computer science and education. Analyses showed that, overall, students reported lower autonomy-oriented help-seeking and higher help-seeking avoidance in computer science than in education. In computer science, perceived peer exclusion predicted more help-seeking avoidance among both male and female students and less autonomy-oriented help-seeking among females. In education, however, perceived peer exclusion was a significant predictor of both male and female students' lower autonomy-oriented help-seeking. Results suggest that, in computer science, help-seeking appears to have an "image problem" signaling competence-related inferiority rather than being a form of effective selfregulated learning. Implications for enhancing adaptive help exchange cultures in computer science are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zander, L., & Höhne, E. (2021). Perceived Peer Exclusion as Predictor of Students’ Help-Seeking Strategies in Higher Education: Differences by Gender and University Major. Zeitschrift Fur Entwicklungspsychologie Und Padagogische Psychologie, 53(1–2), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/a000235

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free