Meta-analysis of studies on chemical, physical and biological agents in the control of Aedes aegypti Infectious Disease epidemiology

33Citations
Citations of this article
180Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Aedes aegypti is a vector of international concern because it can transmit to humans three important arboviral diseases: yellow fever, dengue and chikungunya. Epidemics that are repeated year after year in a variety of urban centers indicate that there are control failures, allowing the vector to continue expanding. Methods: To identify the most effective vector control strategies and the factors that contributed to the success or failure of each strategy, we carried out a systematic review with meta-analysis of articles published in 12 databases, from 1974 to the month of December 2013. We evaluated the association between the use of whatever chemical substance, mechanical agent, biological or integrated actions against A. aegypti and the control of the vector, as measured by 10 indicators. Results: We found 2,791 articles, but after careful selection, only 26 studies remained for analysis related to control interventions implemented in 15 countries, with 5 biological, 5 chemical, 3 mechanical and 13 integrated strategies. The comparison among all of them, indicated that the control of A. aegypti is significantly associated with the type of strategy used, and that integrated interventions consist of the most effective method for controlling A. aegypti. Conclusions: The most effective control method was the integrated approach, considering the influence of eco-bio-social determinants in the virus-vector-man epidemiological chain, and community involvement, starting with community empowerment as active agents of vector control.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lima, E. P., Goulart, M. O. F., & Rolim Neto, M. L. (2015). Meta-analysis of studies on chemical, physical and biological agents in the control of Aedes aegypti Infectious Disease epidemiology. BMC Public Health, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2199-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free