Prediction of survival in non-hodgkin lymphoma based on markers of systemic inflammation, anemia, hypercoagulability, dyslipidemia, and eastern cooperative oncology group performance status

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The International Prognostic Index and its modifications are used to estimate prognosis in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. However, the outcome is often different in patients with similar index scores. The aim of this study was to elaborate a prognostic model for patients with mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma using a combination of predictive markers. The study included 45 patients with mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Before the administration of treatment, clinical and laboratory parameters were measured. After the 35-month follow-up period, overall survival was studied in relation to the data obtained at initial examination. We revealed nine adverse predictive markers for overall survival of enrolled patients: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status >1; erythrocyte sedimentation rate >30 mm/h; levels of hemoglobin <120 g/L, fibrinogen ≥6 g/L, interleukin-6 ≥2 pg/mL, tumor necrosis factor ≥1.45 pg/mL, soluble fibrin monomer complexes >4 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <1.03 mmol/L in men, and <1.29 mmol/L in women; and short activated partial thromboplastin time. A prognostic model for the estimation of the risk of death within the ensuing 1.5-2 years in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma was constructed. Markers of inflammation, anemia, hypercoagulability, dyslipidemia, and poor ECOG status are associated with worse survival in patients with mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dzis, I., Tomashevska, O., Dzis, Y., & Korytko, Z. (2020). Prediction of survival in non-hodgkin lymphoma based on markers of systemic inflammation, anemia, hypercoagulability, dyslipidemia, and eastern cooperative oncology group performance status. Acta Haematologica Polonica, 51(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.2478/ahp-2020-0008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free