On the Logical Ways to Counter an Argument: A Typology and Some Theoretical Consequences

7Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

My aim here is to give an adequate definition of counterargument, establishing a suitable typology of counterarguments grounded on Toulmin’s model. An argument structure is a combination of arguments with an explicit argumentative orientation, positive, negative or neutral. Counterarguing involves conjoining the criticized and the critical argument into a single argumentation. Therefore, counterargumentation produces argument structures, and a classification of counterarguments is by itself a classification of argument structures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marraud, H. (2020). On the Logical Ways to Counter an Argument: A Typology and Some Theoretical Consequences. In Argumentation Library (Vol. 35, pp. 149–166). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28367-4_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free