Impact of 30 mg/kg amikacin and 8 mg/kg gentamicin on serum concentrations in critically ill patients with severe sepsis

60Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: Lowfirst-dose peak serum concentrations of amikacin and gentamicin are commonly reported in ICU patients. The present study aimed to assess whether 30 mg/kg amikacin or 8 mg/kg gentamicin achieved target concentrations in ICU patients with severe sepsis. Patients and methods: Sixty-three ICU patients (Simplified Acute Physiology Score II=43±16) with severe sepsis and an indication for intravenous amikacin (n=47) or gentamicin (n=16) were included. The first (30 mg/kg amikacin; 8 mg/kg gentamicin) and subsequent doses and corresponding peak concentrations (30 min after the completion of an infusion) were recorded. French guideline target concentrations were ≥60 and ≥30 mg/L for amikacin and gentamicin, respectively. A target pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic ratio of 10×MIC was also measured. Results: Pulmonary, abdominal and urinary tract infections were diagnosed in 56 patients. Infection was confirmed in 37 patients (59%). The targeted first-dose peak concentration was achieved in 37/63 patients (59%) [amikacin 36/47 (77%) and gentamicin 1/16 (6%)], and 59/63 patients (94%) achieved the pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic ratio using the MIC data that were available from 21 patients. However, the second dose of aminoglycoside was withheld because of high trough concentrations in nearly half of patients who did not have renal dysfunction. Conclusions: In this study, 30 mg/kg amikacin and 8 mg/kg gentamicin led to target peak serum concentrations in 59% of patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roger, C., Nucci, B., Louart, B., Friggeri, A., Knani, H., Evrard, A., … Muller, L. (2016). Impact of 30 mg/kg amikacin and 8 mg/kg gentamicin on serum concentrations in critically ill patients with severe sepsis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 71(1), 208–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkv291

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free