Lecture X

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The fallacy of concept swapping (i.e. replacement of a synthetic by an analytic judgment) which is responsible for the logicist position on the epistemological status of the axioms of geometry also underlies the empiricist position. The fallacy is shared by famous scientists (e.g. Schröder, Ostwald, and Mach), and it has pushed several high-calibre mathematicians (Gauss, Lobachevsky, Riemann, and Helmholtz) into empiricism, and another (Poincaré) into conventionalism. They all resisted Kant’s solution—the idea of synthetic a priori judgments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nelson, L. (2016). Lecture X. In Argumentation Library (Vol. 26, pp. 91–98). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20783-4_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free