Diagnostic coding of chronic physical conditions in Irish general practice

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Chronic conditions are responsible for significant mortality and morbidity among the population in Ireland. It is estimated that almost one million people are affected by one of the four main categories of chronic disease (cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and diabetes). Primary healthcare is an essential cornerstone for individuals, families, and the community and, as such, should play a central role in all aspects of chronic disease management. Aim: The aim of the project was to examine the extent of chronic disease coding of four chronic physical conditions in the general practice setting. Methods: The design was a descriptive cross-sectional study with anonymous retrospective data extracted from practices. Results: Overall, 8.8% of the adult population in the six participating practices were coded with at least one chronic condition. Only 0.7% of adult patients were coded with asthma, 0.3% with COPD, 3% with diabetes, and 3.3% with CVD. Male patients who visited their GP in the last year were more likely to be coded with any of the four chronic diseases in comparison with female patients. A significant relationship between gender and being coded with diabetes and CVD was found. Conclusions: For a likely multitude of reasons, diagnostic coding in Irish general practice clinics in this study is low and insufficient for an accurate estimation of chronic disease prevalence. Monitoring of information provided through diagnostic coding is important for patients’ care and safety, and therefore appropriate training and reimbursement for these services is essential.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pericin, I., Larkin, J., & Collins, C. (2022). Diagnostic coding of chronic physical conditions in Irish general practice. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 191(4), 1693–1699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02748-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free