Measuring Science

  • van Raan A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

After a review of developments in the quantitative study of science, particularly since the early 1970s, I focus on two current main lines of measuring science based on bibliometric analysis. With the developments in the Leiden group as an example of daily practice, the measurement of research performance and, particularly, the importance of indicator standardisation are discussed, including aspects such as interdisciplinary relations, collaboration, knowledge users. Several important problems are addressed: language bias; timeliness; comparability of different research systems; statistical issues; and the theory-invariance of indicators. Next, an introduction to the mapping of scientific fields is presented. Here basic concepts and issues of practical application of these science maps are addressed. This contribution is concluded with general observations on current and near-future developments, including network-based approaches, necessary next steps are formulated, and an answer is given to the question Can science be measured?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Measuring Science. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (pp. 19–50). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free