Preoperative autologous donation of blood for a simple cardiac anomaly: Analysis of children weighing under twenty kilograms

20Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Preoperative autologous donation of blood has been expanded to cardiac operations in children. However, because of problems such as lack of cooperation and hemodilution during cardiopulmonary bypass, its efficacy in small children is unclear. This study clarifies the clinical significance of preoperative autologous donation of blood in small children. Methods: Thirty-seven patients weighing under 20 kg (age range, 3-9 years; weight range, 13-20 kg) underwent preoperative autologous donation and cardiac operations to treat a simple anomaly. Twenty-five age- and weight-matched patients who were not cooperative or refused preoperative autologous donation served as control subjects. Autologous blood was collected by the simple or leapfrog method and stored as blood components. Each collecting volume was 5 to 10 mL/kg. Results: The donation was performed 6 ± 2 times during 50 ± 16 days, and the whole storage volume was 48 ± 17 mL/kg. There was no serious complication. The minimum hematocrit level negatively correlated with the priming volume of cardiopulmonary bypass (preoperative donation patients: P < .01). In preoperative donation patients postoperative recovery in hemoglobin level was significantly better, which is concurrent with a higher reticulocyte level. Conclusion: Preoperative autologous donation can be performed safely with clinical efficacy, even in children under 20 kg. This can be improved further through coupling with another procedure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Masuda, H., Moriyama, Y., Hisatomi, K., Toda, R., Shimokawa, S., Iguro, Y., … DeCampli, W. M. (2000). Preoperative autologous donation of blood for a simple cardiac anomaly: Analysis of children weighing under twenty kilograms. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 120(4), 783–788. https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2000.109236

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free