Evidence and gaps in the literature on orthorexia nervosa

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
252Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim: To review the literature on the prevalence, risk groups and risk factors of the alleged eating disorder orthorexia nervosa. Methods: We searched Medline and Pubmed using several key terms relating to orthorexia nervosa (ON) and checked the reference list of the articles that we found. Attention was given to methodological problems in these studies, such as the use of non-validated assessment instruments, small sample size and sample characteristics, which make generalization of the results impossible. Results: Eleven studies were found. The average prevalence rate for orthorexia was 6.9 % for the general population and 35-57.8 % for high-risk groups (healthcare professionals, artists). Dieticians and other healthcare professionals are at high risk of ON. Risk factors include obsessive-compulsive features, eating-related disturbances and higher socioeconomic status. Relevant clinical experience, published literature and research data have increased in the last few years. Discussion: The definition and diagnostic criteria of ON remain unclear. Further studies are needed to clarify appropriate diagnostic methods and the place of ON among psychopathological categories. © 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Varga, M., Dukay-Szabó, S., Túry, F., & Van Furth Eric, F. (2013, June). Evidence and gaps in the literature on orthorexia nervosa. Eating and Weight Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-013-0026-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free