Conceptions of democracy, political representation and socio-economic well-being: Explaining how French citizens assess the degree of democracy of their regime

8Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper investigates the determinants of citizens' assessment of the degree of democracy in France, based on the ESS Round 6 data. A substantial share of respondents claims that France is barely democratic or not democratic at all, while still another nonnegligible share gives France the highest possible score on a 11-point democracy scale. We find that democracy assessment is mostly driven by political variables and by policy evaluations rather than by respondents' own social and economic status. Individuals who endorse a minimal definition of democracy are overall less critical of their political system. We also find that respondents who identify with the current government party are consistently more likely to rate France higher on the democracy scale, while voters who identify with a non-governing party do not rate France differently from those who do not feel close to any party. Respondents who consider that the government adequately fights income inequalities are much more likely to consider France democratic. Finally, results regarding the impact of respondents' socio-economic status are inconclusive.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bedock, C., & Panel, S. (2017). Conceptions of democracy, political representation and socio-economic well-being: Explaining how French citizens assess the degree of democracy of their regime. French Politics, 15(4), 389–417. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-017-0043-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free