Gene therapy trials in the UK: Is haemophilia a suitable 'model'?

2Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Gene therapy may be the next major advance for treatment of many diseases, and severe haemophilia (an inherited deficiency of coagulation factor VIII or IX) is a useful model. Progress in gene therapy has been slowed down following fatal multi-organ failure during an adenovirus vector trial for ornithine-transcarbamylase deficiency and two episodes of leukaemia in a retroviral vector trial for severe combined immunodeficiency trial. A small number of early haemophilia clinical trials are in progress or reported. This paper considers ethical and statutory issues related to gene therapy for severe haemophilia within the UK and how these can be addressed through a well-established national network of haemophilia centres. It is likely that these issues will be relevant to clinicians considering gene therapy for other diseases.

References Powered by Scopus

A serious adverse event after successful gene therapy for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency [1]

1684Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evidence for gene transfer and expression of factor IX in haemophilia B patients treated with an AAV vector

902Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gene therapy death prompts review of adenovirus vector

865Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The ethics of gene therapy for hemophilia: a narrative review

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gene therapy for hemophilia? No

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ludlam, C. A. (2004). Gene therapy trials in the UK: Is haemophilia a suitable “model”? Clinical Medicine. Royal College of Physicians. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.4-1-54

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

58%

Researcher 3

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

42%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

42%

Philosophy 1

8%

Chemical Engineering 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0