Tools for a correct design and quality assessment of pragmatic randomized controlled trials: PRECIS, PR-tool and Pragmascope tool

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Identification of scientific data in the systematic reviews required for the rational decisions on health policy is an important tool in determining the validity of the financing of treatment from public funds based on the health technology assessment (HTA). The primary source of scientific medical evidence are randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but their features markedly reduce the possibility of the transfer of the results to the routine practice. In this situation an important role begin to play pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs), providing highly reliable information about drug effectiveness in contrast to observational studies or registries. Here, we described three suitable universal tools, which can be used during the designing or evaluation of reliability of pRCTs: PRECIS, PR-tool and Pragmascope tool. 2013 © Curr. Issues Pharm. Med. Sci.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kaczyński, Ł., & Solnica, B. (2013). Tools for a correct design and quality assessment of pragmatic randomized controlled trials: PRECIS, PR-tool and Pragmascope tool. Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, 26(3), 292–295. https://doi.org/10.12923/j.2084-980X/26.3/a.11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free