A comparison of three methods for visually assessing reef fish communities: time and area compensated

65Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Reef fish assemblage survey results using Transect, Point, and Random in situ visual assessment techniques were evaluated and compared on a coral reef biotope off SW Puerto Rico. Parameters compared were: number of species, number of individuals, and species diversity. Divers using the Random technique recorded the highest number of species per survey; assemblage parameters recorded using Transect and Point methods were statistically similar for most dependent variables. Point surveys, however, had a higher and less variable species diversity. Divers were more efficient in sampling numbers of individuals when using the Transect method. -from Authors

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bortone, S. A., Kimmel, J. J., & Bundrick, C. M. (1989). A comparison of three methods for visually assessing reef fish communities: time and area compensated. Northeast Gulf Science, 10(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.18785/negs.1002.02

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free