The paper examines the current debate on the right to be forgotten in connection with three different issues that revolve around: (i) the construction of individual identities; (ii) how individual and collective memories are intertwined; and, (iii) different forms of oblivion vis-à-vis the idea of forgiveness. The aim is to offer a normative stance in terms of “fair memory” and “difficult forgiveness.” From a philosophical viewpoint, attention is drawn to the dual status of the past, i.e., that which is not any longer and what Paul Ricoeur used to call the “existent state.” From a legal perspective, focus is on how to strike a balance between the subjective claim to be forgotten and further rights of the legal system. From a political outlook, what is at stake concerns the mediation between the relational structure of the law and the inter-subjective nature of forgiveness. Today’s debate has to match up with all these aspects of the right to be forgotten.
CITATION STYLE
Pagallo, U., & Durante, M. (2014). Legal Memories and the Right to Be Forgotten. In Law, Governance and Technology Series (Vol. 17, pp. 17–30). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05720-0_2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.