Maya loves tubby and you should too, if you want to understand and evaluate children's math learning in the digital age

0Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: This article describes a detailed, hypothetical, but quite plausible account of how one child, Maya, made use of math learning software on a touch screen device (Tubby). Focus of Study: The author discusses the kind of research that is possible and necessary to understand children's learning in the digital age, and how that research can contribute to the development of even more effective educational software, and can also largely eliminate the need for high-stakes testing and standard achievement tests. Research Design: Research of this type will require use of complex statistical techniques as well as qualitative methods, such as case studies. The tablet can provide detailed descriptions of children's engagement in the various activities. Tubby can also be used for summative research that provides a valuable portrait of the child's learning over the course of the year. Conclusion: Computers can, in principle, engage children in meaningful learning and at the same time provide educators with the tools for understanding, improving, evaluating, and assessing children's learning.

References Powered by Scopus

School Readiness and Later Achievement

3638Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children

632Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development

471Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ginsburg, H. P. (2017). Maya loves tubby and you should too, if you want to understand and evaluate children’s math learning in the digital age. Teachers College Record, 119(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900306

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

65%

Researcher 3

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 7

44%

Psychology 5

31%

Computer Science 2

13%

Arts and Humanities 2

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free